billroper: (Default)
[personal profile] billroper
It suddenly strikes me that there would be a major advantage to mandating that the electors in the Electoral College be chosen by U.S. House district (with the overall winner for the state getting two bonus electors) instead of the current winner-take-all system:

There would be an incentive to draw competitive House districts rather than safe districts, since you would have the chance of delivering more electoral votes to your party's presidential candidate. On the other hand, the same argument would go for the House of Representatives and hasn't seemed to work yet there, so...

Date: 2004-08-26 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kevinnickerson.livejournal.com
I'd be in favor. As a left winger, I wish most states hadn't been 'winner take all' back in the Reagan days. That's because I got really tired of hearing that RR won 'in a landslide'. From the popular vote he had a significant victory, but not a landslide. (This is for either time he got elected)

Mind, I'd also like a good definition of 'landslide'. I'd accept 80% as landslide, but both sides will claim under 2/3'ds as a landslide if they won.

Profile

billroper: (Default)
billroper

December 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Dec. 29th, 2025 03:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios