billroper: (Default)
[personal profile] billroper
My primary home machine has been running Vista Ultimate since I built it. The Vista updating process has been getting uglier and uglier for months now and takes a long time to load anything that comes down from Windows Update.

I decided it was time to bite the bullet yesterday and pulled the upgrade copy of Windows 7 Ultimate off the shelf to update the machine. It took a while, but it installed.

Then it pulled 83 updates. Now it's pulling down Windows 7 SP1.

So far, so good.

I'm still keeping my fingers crossed. (And it's damnably hard to type this way...)

Date: 2011-07-06 04:30 am (UTC)
tollermom: (Default)
From: [personal profile] tollermom
Win7 is sooooooo much better than Vista. You'll like it!

Date: 2011-07-06 07:33 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] filkertom.livejournal.com
Ditto over here. I'm still running Vista on my laptop, and I still hate it on my laptop. The main desk machine has been ever so much happier since it went directly from XP to Win7/64-bit.

Date: 2011-07-06 12:42 pm (UTC)
ext_63737: Posing at Zeusaphone concert, 2008 (Default)
From: [identity profile] beamjockey.livejournal.com
If there are 83 updates to Windows 7 Ultimate, then it's hardly very ultimate at all, is it?

Date: 2011-07-06 02:16 pm (UTC)
bedlamhouse: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bedlamhouse
Echo the thumbs-up on Win 7. It loads so fast compared to Vista and XP, with a drastically smaller services load, that I am contemplating the (expensive) move of my recording PC sooner rather than later.

Date: 2011-07-06 05:18 pm (UTC)
bedlamhouse: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bedlamhouse
Yeah, I already know they don't exist for Win7 64, so I will need to upgrade my ADAT interface. I'm watching for either a good eBay used RME PCIe all-in-one or a Digiface with the PCIe interface, or I may move to a MOTU.

Date: 2011-07-06 07:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purpleranger.livejournal.com
It's even harder to use the mouse with your fingers crossed.

Date: 2011-07-06 07:09 pm (UTC)
bedlamhouse: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bedlamhouse
Specs for RayDAT don't show an ADAT SYNC, which I tend to end up using if things are too noisy to bring all tracks down at once - is it just not mentioned that the sync exists?

The good thing about the Digiface is it is external and has multiple interface types available so if/when I get beyond ADAT I can just switch.

Date: 2011-07-06 08:37 pm (UTC)
bedlamhouse: (Default)
From: [personal profile] bedlamhouse
Of course, I also have an old DataSync2 unit that I use to translate between ADAT sync and MMC/MTC, so my mileage may vary a whole lot. :)

This. The purpose of the ADAT sync isn't for the sync of the individual digital streams (the first channel of the lightpipe does that), it's to keep the time code.

Profile

billroper: (Default)
billroper

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 10th, 2026 05:22 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios