Technolust
May. 7th, 2011 10:06 pmWhile I was at Staples with Julie this afternoon, I spent a bit of time playing with the Nook Color. (This was a challenge with Julie waiting for me.) I don't really need an e-book reader, but I would like a portable web browsing device that's handier than a laptop and bigger than my iPod Touch. I looked at a couple of web pages that I frequent on the device and it seemed to work pretty well.
Is there any reason not to get a Nook Color? Is there some other device that I should be looking at instead? (Because buyer's remorse is just really annoying...)
Thanks!
Is there any reason not to get a Nook Color? Is there some other device that I should be looking at instead? (Because buyer's remorse is just really annoying...)
Thanks!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 03:39 am (UTC)I'm not saying buy the iPad for definite, but if you're looking at a web-browser with a secondary use as an e-reader (and a lot of other things for me!), it's worth checking out, to make sure you don't play with the thing later and have Nookremorse.
Um... also, hi! Lurking fan here. *blush*
no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 03:40 am (UTC)But then again, unless you have some specific need, it's likely that the Nook as is will do what you need.
Personally I bought a 7" tablet, installed Nook for Android on it, but then found that the Nook software (at least on my tablet) wasn't nearly the best reader out there. I tried a few and am currently using Cool Reader.
All THAT said, this afternoon I actually decided to switch back to my old Sony eInk reader for reading. It doesn't do anything but read, but it does that really well. Primarily what I like about it is that it runs for a couple of weeks on a charge. With the color LCD device I had to plug it in every day.
I do REALLY like having the android device for other things though. Todo list management, calendar, contact list all synced to my Google account, plus all the free crosswords I can possibly do every day, and a bunch of other games and apps.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 11:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 01:00 pm (UTC)(Yes I am biased)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 04:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 04:48 pm (UTC)Thanks for the advice!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 05:27 pm (UTC)Bad Things: As an e-book reader, it's excellent... unless you are outdoors. Then the screen glare is REALLY distracting- to the point that I cannot use it. Either you have a reflection of your face you're trying to see through, or a reflection of the sky, or a reflection of.. well, you get the point.
But, that's the only bad point.
Good points:
I set up the calendar app to sync only with Google; and maintain online shared calendars with my wife. We can both dynamically update, and see them on phone, computer, or iPad with no problems.
If reading e-books on both the iTouch and iPad (which I do; because the iTouch is definitely more portable, and the iPad is nicer to sit with at home), I can read the same book on both. Each sync with the computer updates the side I haven't been reading, copies over bookmarks, etc.
The screen real-estate is excellent- I've started to dispense almost completely with keeping paper lyrics; and doing it all on the iPad. The OnSong app allows me to share lyrics via Bluetooth with other iPhones and iTouches, as well as sharing via email. It's just a bit smaller than a piece of paper, but I can make the lyrics bigger. And if the song is bigger than the screen, it will scroll as I play. NO MORE HEAVY STACKS OF BOOKS! :)
Magazines work really well. Have not yet had the chance to try comics; but what little I've seen so far looks real promising.
The iPad has freed me from the computer desk at home- I can browse the web and do email from the couch (and regularly do).
In the near future I intend to start using it as an effects box for my guitar (yes, you can do that). Not to mention that with the Garageband app, you have in your hand an 8 track studio. Get the right attachment kit for this (which is really just a midi interface) and with the other kit you have you have a portable recording studio that fits in a *single* *bag*. Except for the microphone stand. Check with Mike Whitaker for real-use cases.
And when I travel- it has replaced (and is 90% lighter) than my laptop.
There are a lot of kids apps for it; and the girls can't really harm it, short of throwing it across the room.
Did I balk at the price? You betcha. A bit more than a month into my ownership (six weeks, now); it's rapidly becoming an essential online tool for me.
For you, Bill; I think a question you need to consider would be this: Android and iOS are *not* cross compatible. At all. (Android is Java based, iOS is Objective C). If you ever think, "Hm, I wonder if I could get (this cool thing that runs on Android) to run on my iPod Touch?" you're lost. It generally won't work- and you can end up wasting a fair amount of time just looking for similar apps from developers that don't write for both platforms.
So, have I fleshed out this particular camel's nose enough? :)
no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 08:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-08 11:12 pm (UTC)But I'm going to wait a while, mainly because the relevant technologies appear to be in fairly rapid development stages. My biggest gripes (such as they are) with the Nook are screen glare and limited availability of apps. I'm curious to see what will come out using Qualcomm's new Mirasol (http://www.qualcomm.com/products_services/consumer_electronics/displays/mirasol/index.html) screen technology - I saw a demo at CES in January, and it's really nice-looking. I also want to see what develops with the rumors of an Amazon Android tablet. Finally, Android 3.0, which is the first version optimized for tablet-sized devices, is just now starting to show up on devices you can actually buy.
In general, the Android Tablet Forum (http://www.androidtablets.net/) is a good place to keep up on the latest news and reviews.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-09 12:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-09 04:50 am (UTC)