billroper: (Default)
[personal profile] billroper
I hate religious arguments. That said, I object to getting an e-mail that says, "Hi, we're going to reformat all of your carefully formatted source code, because we don't like your formatting style."

I understand that I'm not formally working on that particular project at the moment, but it still rankles.

Date: 2009-08-15 11:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] grey-lensman.livejournal.com
Wait -- they're being paid to waste time and risk introducing bugs into a working codebase? Wierd.

Date: 2009-08-15 08:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] whl.livejournal.com
Some people's styles are drifting where I work; we used to match and now they are starting to differ. But that can be good, as it means I can look at a part of the code and tell someone edited it after I did and introduced the bug. (And ask them why they thought that was right.)

Also, language changes cause issues. Which is preferable:
[NSThread detachNewThreadSelector: @selector(auth:) toTarget: self withObject: SSID];

or

[NSThread detachNewThreadSelector : @selector(auth :) toTarget : self withObject : SSID];



Date: 2009-08-15 11:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kizoku42.livejournal.com
Well, consistent -is- better, in that if everybody uses the same system then everybody understands it better. But what -he's- saying is,

"Your formatting is so clear and understandable that I can easily understand it and can convert it to this other system without any chance of confusing anyone."

But if it's that clear, what's the point? :-)

Profile

billroper: (Default)
billroper

February 2026

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 13th, 2026 12:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios