I Can't Get No Satisfaction
Aug. 14th, 2019 07:42 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It is being a very frustrating day for a variety of reasons. With luck, some of these will improve.
In the meantime, a brief rant:
There are only two states in the Union that allocate electoral votes on the basis of Congressional district: Maine and Nebraska. All of the other states are "winner take all". Thus, with the exception of Maine and Nebraska, there is no way that gerrymandering can directly affect the Electoral College.
Having watched two separate people today try to explain why we need to change the Electoral College because it is subject to gerrymandering, I am acutely frustrated. There might be reasons that we would want to change the Electoral College system (I do not agree with those who do, if for no other reason than I believe it to be a useful firewall against vote fraud -- said the man who lives next door to the city where vote fraud is a national joke), but gerrymandering is not one of them.
*thud* *thud* *thud*
In the meantime, a brief rant:
There are only two states in the Union that allocate electoral votes on the basis of Congressional district: Maine and Nebraska. All of the other states are "winner take all". Thus, with the exception of Maine and Nebraska, there is no way that gerrymandering can directly affect the Electoral College.
Having watched two separate people today try to explain why we need to change the Electoral College because it is subject to gerrymandering, I am acutely frustrated. There might be reasons that we would want to change the Electoral College system (I do not agree with those who do, if for no other reason than I believe it to be a useful firewall against vote fraud -- said the man who lives next door to the city where vote fraud is a national joke), but gerrymandering is not one of them.
*thud* *thud* *thud*
no subject
Date: 2019-08-15 04:37 am (UTC)How might the Electoral College be a useful firewall against vote fraud? It seems to me that under the present system, vote fraud in a single close state could swing a Presidential election, but that could not occur if the national popular vote determined the winner.
I don't know anything about vote fraud in Chicago these days, but here is an article about alleged vote fraud in Chicago in 1960:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/08/heres-a-voter-fraud-myth-richard-daley-stole-illinois-for-john-kennedy-in-the-1960-election/
no subject
Date: 2019-08-15 04:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2019-08-15 07:25 pm (UTC)But on the whole, I have to agree, some people are dumb.
I think the Electoral College should be abolished today, because while I understand the reasons it was invented and how they made sense 230 years ago, I think the country has changed and it doesn't make sense today. But because of gerrymandering? No. Just no.
no subject
Date: 2019-08-15 11:33 pm (UTC)