Password Stupidity
Nov. 22nd, 2005 06:09 pmApparently, the latest upgrade to the Oracle system here at work that I need to use to enter my expenses has "improved" the integrity of our passwords. The password may not contain a common word. The password may not contain any double letters. The password must contain at least one number, but cannot consist of all numbers.
In short, the password must be taped to your monitor, because there is no prospect that you will ever remember it.
In short, the password must be taped to your monitor, because there is no prospect that you will ever remember it.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 01:33 am (UTC)I then go on to tell them to choose a phrase that they won't forget, like "There is nothing to fear but fear itself". From that, I take the first letter from each word (tintfbfi) and then do a couple of letter/number replacements, to get something like t1n2fbf! I also tell them to choose a letter to capitalize, and suggest (but don't generally insist) that it not be the first letter. (t1N2fbf!)
That way, while you're following all the rules of strong passwords, you've also got something that's relatively easy to remember in the first few days because of the mnemonic. It's still more awkward than a password like (light), but it's a lot stronger, too. After the first few days of typing it in, muscle memory tends to take over anyway. I have clients with passwords like that that can't tell me what their password is, but they can type it quickly and easily. Which is the way is SHOULD be. 8
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 04:10 am (UTC)It turned out that my previous main password would pass the silly new rules, although the current one won't.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 03:27 am (UTC)Single sign on is a double edged sword. It would make my life so much easier if I could sign in once and be good for everything I need access to... but if someone manages to hack one of my passwords then they have access to everything. It's a conundrum.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 03:01 pm (UTC)Which, as you and I know, defeats the purpose of so-called "strong" passwords.
How many pointy-haired bosses out there still put their passwords in plain sight, or hide them under the keyboard?
One of the bank systems I was on at my last computer job had even more stringent rules: Not only could the password use double letters, it wouldn't allow letters repeated in the password! (In other words, "babylon5" was out because it repeated the "b".) And the current and subsequent passwords could not repeat any letters in the same position.
(Example" "baldric1" could not be followed by "milkwe3d" because the "l" in the third position was repeated in the two passwords.
The reason for all this security? So that it will thwart the black-hat crackers out there using password-cracking programs with large dictionaries.
P.S. I write mine down on a small Post-It(tm) note and stick it in my wallet.
no subject
Date: 2005-11-23 03:58 pm (UTC)I am fortunate in that when I've bumped into an asinine password policy, it's always been in a place where I either had root privileges or knew someone who did, and was able to use them to put in place an acceptable-to-me, memorable password.
If it helps...
Date: 2005-11-24 04:42 am (UTC)For example (and I've never used this one) jet6^aime
Happy Thanksgiving.
Re: If it helps...
Date: 2005-11-24 05:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-11-27 01:51 am (UTC)