Date: 2016-03-13 08:01 pm (UTC)
My thought experiment ran to the same end you've arrived at here, but do notice that I have never been to a WSFS meeting, and I'll further clarify that I am no parliamentarian.

Given that WSFS has the reputation of being quite expert in parliamentary procedures, and that those same procedures must have within them means of coping with the disruptive, and guessing (see also: "no parliamentarian") that sergaents-at-arms are there to keep the meeting moving along its rules-borne path, I wondered how they might actually do that.

I can conceive of any number of ways to eject the dismissive unruly, but assumed that Mr. Roberts and, frankly, you guys, had this all figured out.

What would I do? Do you really want my input?

K.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

billroper: (Default)
billroper

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 24th, 2025 07:21 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios