Nov. 4th, 2004

billroper: (Default)
If I haven't responded to your post on the preceding thread that posed questions, it's not because I'm ignoring you -- it's just that I'm still pulling the response together.

Meanwhile, we're trying to push a product out to beta test here at work and trying to get the first ISFiC Press book launched.

And I'm treading water. :)
billroper: (Default)
If I haven't responded to your post on the preceding thread that posed questions, it's not because I'm ignoring you -- it's just that I'm still pulling the response together.

Meanwhile, we're trying to push a product out to beta test here at work and trying to get the first ISFiC Press book launched.

And I'm treading water. :)
billroper: (Default)
In response to yesterday's post, [livejournal.com profile] folkmew asked what I thought about the justices that Bush might nominate to the Supreme Court. I answered there, but figured I'd copy it up to the front.
Judicial thoughts inside )
billroper: (Default)
In response to yesterday's post, [livejournal.com profile] folkmew asked what I thought about the justices that Bush might nominate to the Supreme Court. I answered there, but figured I'd copy it up to the front.
Judicial thoughts inside )

Profile

billroper: (Default)
billroper

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 15th, 2025 03:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios