Interesting. I'm not a big fan of Ahnult's governance, but I have to admit that, on its face, that idea has a lot to recommend it. The devil will be in the details, but by all means it should be looked at.
I listened to parts of his speech this morning on NPR, and I thought pretty well of it. He's got lots of good intentions, I hope he can make some of them work. I also think gerrymandering is reprehensible.
If I had my way, I'd find a way to remove as much of the human element from the redistricting process as possible. Assuming the US Census can provide a reasonably accurate distribution of the population over the geography of a state, there should be a reasonable algorithm that produces geographically concentrated blocks containing the target population (within a reasonable range). Perhaps showing my bias coming from a low-population state, I'd want the algorithm to try to do it by whole counties, then by any sub-county organization, working down by township, section, sub-section, and finally into neighborhoods etc.
Of course, this would be seen as unfair by those who feel that there must be a district that represents some specific group.
I doubt that the politicians would ever stand for this, or anything else that preserves the status-quo that they depend on.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 05:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 06:16 pm (UTC)gerrymandering
Date: 2005-01-06 09:26 pm (UTC)Re: gerrymandering
From:Re: gerrymandering
From:Re: gerrymandering
From:Re: gerrymandering
From:Re: gerrymandering
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-06 11:41 pm (UTC)B
Re: Gerrymandering
Date: 2005-01-07 04:03 pm (UTC)Of course, this would be seen as unfair by those who feel that there must be a district that represents some specific group.
I doubt that the politicians would ever stand for this, or anything else that preserves the status-quo that they depend on.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-10 08:10 pm (UTC)