ext_256157 ([identity profile] mhagerman.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] billroper 2010-03-27 12:13 am (UTC)

Simple, obvious...and wrong.

From the article:
The individual mandate is a compromise attempt to avoid the obvious solution: Let government — not private companies — provide single-payer, catastrophic health coverage for everyone.

It's not the obvious solution; it's one of several...and the worst one. The best solution is too large for the margin of this book, but:

  • encourage employers to stop providing medical insurance, and to transfer their current expenditures for that into employees' salaries

  • adjust the tax code so that expenditures for medical insurance and MSAs are non-taxable, inheritable, and with high-enough limits to absorb the "pay increase"

  • use the Commerce Clause (appropriately) to enable individuals to purchase such insurance from any provider, in any state

  • create a Federally-chartered, non-tax-funded, non-profit insurance entity to provide basic medical insurance to anyone who wants to buy it...but at actuarially-sound rates


Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org